Teori Corporate Governance: Keterbatasan, Kritik dan Alternatif
Abstract
Corporate governance is a crucial element in supporting the competitiveness and sustainability of companies in a dynamic business environment. This article discusses three main theories underpinning corporate governance: agency theory, stakeholder theory, and stewardship theory. These theories offer different perspectives on the relationships between managers and stakeholders and their impact on effective governance. This research employs a qualitative approach with an interpretivist paradigm to understand the social constructions and subjective meanings of corporate governance practices in Indonesia. The findings reveal that while good governance generally enhances company performance, the effectiveness of various governance elements differs. Cultural factors and ownership structures also play a significant role in determining the form and success of corporate governance. These insights provide new perspectives for formulating more flexible and contextual governance strategies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Berle, A. A. 1932. For whom corporate managers are trustees: a note. Harvard law review, 45(8), 1365-1372.
Blair, M. M. 1995. Rethinking assumptions behind corporate governance. Challenge, 38(6), 12-17.
Burrell, G. 1988. Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization studies, 9(2), 221-235.
Brown, Jill A., & William R. Forster, 2013, CSR and Stakeholder Theory: A Tale of Adam Smith, Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 301-312
Coelho, A. A. 2003. Indexing of powder diffraction patterns by iterative use of singular value decomposition. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 36(1), 86-95.
Cooper, R. 1989. Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 3: The contribution of Jacques Derrida. Organization studies, 10(4), 479-502.
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. 1991. Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of management, 16(1), 49-64.
Dao, Binh & Nguyen, Tra. 2020. A meta-analysis of corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Governance and Regulation. 9. 18-39.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of management review, 14(1), 57-74.
El Diri, M., Lambrinoudakis, C., & Alhadab, M. 2020. Corporate governance and earnings management in concentrated markets. Journal of Business Research, 108, 291-306.
Friedman, M. 1970. A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13(1970), 32-33.
Freeman RE, 2001, Perspectives in Bussiness Ethic Sie
Freeman, R. & Mcvea, John. 2001. A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Freeman, R. E. 2004. The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift für wirtschafts-und unternehmensethik, 5(3), 228-254.
Foucault, M. 1974. The Archaeology of Knowledge
Hutton, A. P. 2007. A discussion of ‘corporate disclosure by family firms’. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1-2), 287-297.
Huynh, Q. L. 2020. A triple of corporate governance, social responsibility and earnings management. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(3), 29-40.
Jackson, N., & Carter, P. 1995. Organizational chiaroscuro: Throwing light on the concept of corporate governance. Human Relations, 48(8), 875-889.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 2019. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Corporate Governance, 77-132. Gower.
Kay, J. 1995. Silberston. Corporate Governance, National Institute Economic Review.
Keasey, K., Thompson, S., & Wright, M. 1997. Corporate governance: Economic and financial issues. OUP Oxford.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance.
Letza, S., Kirkbride, J., Sun, X., & Smallman, C. 2008. Corporate governance theorising: limits, critics and alternatives. International Journal of law and management.
Lukviarman, N., & Johan, A. P. 2018. Meta-analysis of corporate governance in Asia. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(2), 267-280.
Mayntz, R., Holm, K., & Hübner, P. 1976. Introduction to empirical sociology.
Mayson, S. W., French, D., & Ryan, C. L. 1994. Corporation law. Black-stone Press, London.
Mueller, Dennis C., 1989. Mergers: Causes, effects and policies, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7(1), 1-10
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & De Colle, S. 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403-445.
Roche, J., 2005. Corporate governance in Asia.
Roy, WG, 1997, Sosialisasi modal, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Turnbull, Shann, 1997, Corporate Governance: Its Scope, Concerns & Theories. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5(4), 180-205
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v8i2.1997
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ekonomis: Journal of Economics and Business Published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat |