Determinan Work Engagement dan Proactive Personality Terhadap Innovation Work Behaviour pada Karyawan Generasi Milenial di Jakarta
Abstract
Innovative work behavior (IWB) is a very important factor in achieving competitive advantage and continuity of an organization, especially for millennial employees. This research discusses Work Engagement and Proactive Personality that occur in millennial generation employees. The method used in this research is a quantitative method with a population of millennial generation employees in Jakarta. The sample used used a sampling technique, namely purposive sampling, with 100 respondents. The results of this research are that the Work Engagement variable has a significance value for Innovation work behavior of 0.049, while the Proactive Personality variable has a significance value for Innovation work behavior of 0.058. From the coefficient of determination, it can be concluded that the Work Engagement and Proactive Personality variables influence Innovation work behavior by 16.6%, while the other variables are 83.4% influenced by other variables.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akgunduz, Y., Adan Gök, Ö., & Alkan, C. 2020. The effects of rewards and proactive personality on turnover intentions and meaning of work in hotel businesses. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 20(2), 170–183.
Asadullah, M. A. 2020. Organizational identification perceptions and millennials’ creativity: testing the mediating role of work engagement and the moderating role of work values. September.
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. 1993. The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118.
Bannay, Dheyaa & Hadi, Mohammed & Amanah, Ahmed. 2020. The impact of inclusive leadership behaviors on innovative workplace behavior with an emphasis on the mediating role of work engagement. Problems and Perspectives in Management. 18(3), 479-491.
Benedek, M., Bruckdorfer, R., & Jauk, E. 2020. Motives for creativity: Exploring the what and why of everyday creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 610–625.
Budiono, I., & Yasin, M. 2020. Innovative Work Behaviour in the Neo-Sufism Order : The Role of Prophetic Leadership and Employee Engagement. 14(4).
Choi, S. B., Kim, K., Ullah, S. M. E., & Kang, S.-W. 2016. How transformational leadership facilitates innovative behavior of Korean workers: Examining mediating and moderating processes. Personnel Review.
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. 2010. Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36.
Fiernaningsih, N., Herijanto, P., Widayani, A., Niaga, A., Malang, P. N., & Kunci, K. 2022. Pengaruh Work Engagement dan Proactive Personality terhadap Innovative Work Behavior. 13–14.
Fong, P. S. W., Men, C., Luo, J., & Jia, R. 2018. Knowledge hiding and team creativity: the contingent role of task interdependence. Management Decision, 56(2), 329–343.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. 2002. Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: the role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687.
Hu, S., Liu, H., Zhang, S., & Wang, G. 2020. Proactive personality and cross-cultural adjustment: Roles of social media usage and cultural intelligence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 74, 42–57.
Jafri, M. H., Dem, C., & Choden, S. 2016. Emotional intelligence and employee creativity: Moderating role of proactive personality and organizational climate. Business Perspectives and Research, 4(1), 54–66.
Janssen, O. 2000. Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.
Kahn, W. A. 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
Kanter, R. M. 2009. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Knowledge management and organizational design, 93–131. Routledge.
Li, H., Sajjad, N., Wang, Q., Muhammad Ali, A., Khaqan, Z., & Amina, S. 2019. Influence of transformational leadership on employees’ innovative work behavior in sustainable organizations: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Sustainability, 11(6), 1594.
Li, S.-L., Sun, F., & Li, M. 2019. Sustainable human resource management nurtures change-oriented employees: Relationship between high-commitment work systems and employees’ taking charge behaviors. Sustainability, 11(13), 3550.
Liang, J., & Gong, Y. 2013. Capitalizing on proactivity for informal mentoring received during early career: The moderating role of core self‐evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(8), 1182–1201.
Okolo, D. 2018. An exploration of the relationship between technostress, employee engagement and job design from the Nigerian banking employee’s perspective. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 6(4), 511–531.
Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. 2010. Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662.
Presbitero, A. 2015. Proactivity in career development of employees: The roles of proactive personality and cognitive complexity. Career Development International.
Sari, D. K., Yudiarso, A., & Sinambela, F. C. 2021. Work Engagement and Innovative Work Behavior : Meta-Analysis Study. 530, 359–366.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. 2002. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.
Scott, S. G., & Reginald. 1994. Determinants of Innovative Behavior: a Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace Susanne. IET Radar, Sonar and Navigation, 37(3), 580–607.
Soda, G., Stea, D., & Pedersen, T. 2019. Network structure, collaborative context, and individual creativity. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1739–1765.
Tan, A. B. C., Van Dun, D. H., & Wilderom, C. P. M. 2021. Innovative work behavior in Singapore evoked by transformational leaders through innovation support and readiness. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(4), 697–712.
Tan, C., Lau, X., Kung, Y., & Kailsan, R. A. 2019. Openness to experience enhances creativity: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation and the creative process engagement. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(1), 109–119.
West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. 1990. Innovation at work. John Wiley & Sons.
Xiao, M., & Cooke, F. L. 2019. Why and when knowledge hiding in the workplace is harmful: a review of the literature and directions for future research in the Chinese context. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 57(4), 470–502.
Zhao, H., Liu, W., Li, J., & Yu, X. 2019. Leader–member exchange, organizational identification, and knowledge hiding: T he moderating role of relative leader–member exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7), 834–848.
Zhu, Y.-Q., Gardner, D. G., & Chen, H.-G. 2018. Relationships between work team climate, individual motivation, and creativity. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2094–2115.
Zyl, L. E. Van. 2021. Work engagement and task performance within a global Dutch ICT-consulting firm : The mediating role of innovative work behaviors. 4012–4023.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v8i1.1554
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ekonomis: Journal of Economics and Business Published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat |
