Analisis Fraud Pentagon terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada Tahun 2011-2020)
Abstract
This research aims to detect fraudulent financial reports using the fraud pentagon. The research uses elements in the form of financial targets, financial instability, number of independent commissioners, special party receivable transactions, special party debt transactions, special party sales transactions, special party purchase transactions, change of auditors, change of directors, and number of CEO photos. The sample in this research is 108 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2011-2020 period which were selected using a purposive sampling method. The sample companies in this study consisted of 54 fraud companies and 54 non-fraud companies. In testing the hypothesis using logistic regression analysis using the SPSS test tool. The results of this research show that financial targets and financial instability are not the driving factors for management to commit financial statement fraud, receivables transactions with privileged parties are a driving factor for fraud, but this is not the case for debt, sales and purchase transactions with privileged parties. Likewise, changing auditors in a particular financial year is also a driving factor for fraud, but not changing directors. Finally, the number of directors' photos in the annual report is not a driving factor in financial statement fraud.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Albrecht, W. S., & Albrecht, C. O. 2006. Fraud Examination & Prevention.
Andriani, K. F., Budiartha, K., Sari, M. M. R., & Widanaputra, A. A. G. P. 2022. Fraud pentagon elements in detecting fraudulent financial statement. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6(1), 686–710.
Anggraini, W. R., & Suryani, A. W. 2021. Fraudulent financial reporting through the lens of the fraud pentagon theory. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 8(1), 1–12.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). 2022. Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report to the nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners
Aulia Haqq, A. P. N., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. 2020. Analisa teori fraud pentagon sebagai pendeteksi kecurangan pada laporan keuangan. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 22(3), 319–332.
ACFE. 2018. Report to The Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse: 2018 Global Fraud Study. Texas: Association of Certified Fraud Examiner
Christian, N., Basri, Y. Z., & Arafah. 2019. Analysis of Fraud Triangle, Fraud Diamond and Fraud Pentagon Theory to Detecting Corporate Fraud in Indonesia. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 3(4), 73–78.
Cressey, D. 1953. Other People’s Money; a Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Glencoe, IL, Free Press.
Crowe, Howarth. 2011. The Fraud Pentagon: Considering the Five Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal
Devi, P. N. C., Widanaputra, A. A. G. P., Budiasih, I. G. A. N., & Rasmini, N. K. 2021. The Effect of Fraud Pentagon Theory on Financial Statements: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 1163–1169.
Dwi Maryadi, A., Puspa Midiastuty, P., Suranta, E., & Robiansyah, A. 2020. Pengaruh fraud pentagon dalam mendeteksi fraudulent financial reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 2(1), 13–25.
Fathmaningrum, E. S., & Anggarani, G. 2021. Fraud Pentagon and Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 22(3), 625–646.
Gede, I., Putra, C., Saitri, P. W., Bagus, G., & Gunadi, N. 2019. Accounting Fraud Tendency on Village Credit Institution. International Journal of Accounting & Finance in Asia Pasific, 2(2), 1–9.
Hapsari, S. A. 2018. Determinan Fraudulent Financial Reportingdalam Perspektif Trianggle Fraud. Jurnal Perkotaan, 10(2).
Harman, S. A., & Bernawati, Y. 2020. Determinant of Financial Statement Fraud: Fraud Pentagon Perspective in Manufacturing Companies. Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online, 19(4), 628–638.
Henry, E., Gordon, E. A., & Reed, B. 2007. The Role of Related Party Transactions in Fraudulent Financial Reporting.
Holly, A., Jao, R., Mardiana, A., & Tangke, P. 2023. Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional, Ukuran Perusahaan, dan Manajemen Aset Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. JAF (Journal of Accounting And Finance), 7(1), 12-26
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. 2015. Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan. Jakarta: Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. 1976, Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Kohlbeck.M, & Mayhew.Brian.W. 2016. Comparison Between Different DDimer Cutoff Values To Assess The Individual Risk Of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: Analysis Of Results Obtained In The DULCIS Study. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, 38(1), 42–49
Lastanti, H. S. 2020. Role of Audit Committee in The Fraud Pentagon and Financial Statement Fraud. International Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 2(1), 85–102.
Luhri, A. S. R. N., Mashuri, A. A. S., & Ermaya, H. N. L. 2021. Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Komite Audit sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 3(1), 15–30.
Mahesarani, D. S., & Chariri, A. 2016. Corporate Governance and Financial Statement Frauds: Evidence From Indonesia. The 1st International Conference on Economics, Education, Business, and Accounting (ICEEBA), 489–495.
Pratami, S. R., Widowati, Y. S., & Prapti, L. 2019. Influence Of Fraud Pentagon Toward Fraudulent Financial Reporting In Indonesia An Empirical Study On Financial Sector Listed In Indonesian Stock Exchange. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(8), 237–242
Puspitaningrum, M. T., Taufiq, E., & Wijaya, S. Y. 2019. Pengaruh Fraud Triangle sebagai Prediktor Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan, 21(1).
Sawaka K., I. G. N. H., & Ramantha, I. W. 2020. Fraud pentagon theory in detecting financial perception of financial reporting with good corporate governance as moderator variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 7(1), 84–94.
Sokarina, A. 2012. Analisis Kritis Kinerja Pra dan Pascaprivatisasi dari Perspektif Political Economy of Accounting (Studi pada PT Telkom Tbk dan PT Indosat Tbk).
Syafira, N. F., & Cahyaningsih, 2022. Financial Reporting Fraud Analysis from The Perspective of The Pentagon Fraud. Indonesia Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Kontemporer, 14(1), 83–91.
Thomas, F. B. 2022. The Role of Purposive Sampling Technique as a Tool for Informal Choices in a Social Sciences in Research Methods. Just Agricultutr, 2(5), 1–7.
Utami, E. R., Muhammadiyah, U., Jalan, Y., Selatan, L., Tirto, T., Kasihan, B., & Pusparini, N. O. 2019. The Analysis of Fraud Pentagon Theory and Financial Distress for Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Banking Sector in Indonesia (Empirical Study of Listed Banking Companies on Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012-2017). Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 60–65.
Wolfe, D., & Hermanson, D. R. 2004. The Fraud Diamond: Considering Four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal, 74, 38-42.
Yanti, D. D. 2021. Analisis Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan pada Sektor Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia.
Yudhanti, N. C. 2016. Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Indikasi Kecurangan dalam Pelaporan Keuangan dengan Model Fraud Diamond (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2013-2015).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v8i2.1630
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ekonomis: Journal of Economics and Business Published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat |
