Evaluasi Kinerja Perbankan ASEAN Terkait Peningkatan Risiko Sistemik dalam Integrasi Pasar Perdagangan Bebas Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (MEA)
Abstract
This study is aimed to provide an evaluation of banking performance in ASEAN given the inclusion of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) which is associated with an increase in potential systemic risk. Some of the main findings in this study are: (a) the increase in systemic risk is influenced by the increase in risk on asset quality as seen from the increase in the percentage of non-performing loans; (b) bank liquidity has a significant positive effect on increasing systemic risk; (c) banks with large capital can exert influence over increased systemic risk (in a 90% confidence level but here we use 95% confidence level). The government is expected to be able to mitigate the increase in potential systemic risks, especially after the integration of free trade in ASEAN.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acharya, Viral, V. (2009). A theory as systemic risk and design of prudential bank regulation. PhD Dissertaion of NYU.
Bartram, S., Brown, G.W., Hund, J. (2007). Estimating Systemic Risk in the International Financial System. Journal of Financial Economics 86, 835-Bekhet, Ali H., Shorouq F. K. Eletter. (2014). Credit risk assessment model for Jordanian commercial banks: Neural Scoring Approach. Review of Development Science.
Billio, M., Getmansky, M., Lo, Andres, dan Pellizon. (2010). Measuring systemic risk in the finance and insurance sector. MIT Sloan School, working paper #4774-10.
Bisias et al. (2012). A survey of systemic risk analytics. Offfice of Financial Research, Working Paper #0001.
Freixas, X., Parigi, B. M., dan Rochet, J. C. (2000). Systemic risk, interbank relations, and liquidity proviosion by the central bank. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 32, 611-638.
Chen, Yehning. (1999). Banking panics: The rule of the first-come, first-served rule and information externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 107, No.5.
Group of Ten. (2001). Consolidation in the financial sector. Working Group Report, January.
Hadad, Muliaman, Santoso, Wimboh, dan A., Bambang. (2003). Indikator awal krisis perbankan. www.bi.go.id diakses pada 12 Oktober 2015.
Idier, Julien, et. al. (2013). How useful is the Marginal Expected Shortfall for the measurement of systemic exposure? A practical assessment. Euro System, Working Paper Series, No. 1546.
Inpres No. 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Peningkatan daya Saing Nasional Dalam Rangka Menghadapi MEA
Jonghe, O.D., Diepstraten, M., Schepens, G. (2015). Bank’s size, scope, and systemic risk: What the role for conflicts of interest. Journal of Banking and Finance.
Pangestuti, R.S. (2018). Pengaruh Risiko Sistemik terhadap Risiko Kredit dan Risiko Likuiditas pada Perbankan di ASEAN-4. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi fakultas Ekonomi, Vol.4, No.1.
Rose dan Hudgin, S. (2010). Bank and other financial institution. Mc Graw Hill.
Weiβ, G.N.F., Bostandzic, D., Neumann, S. (2014). What factors drive systemic risk during international crises? Journal of Banking and Finance, 41, 78-96.
Yun, J., Moon, H. (2014). Measuring systemic risk in the Korean banking sector via dynamic conditional correlation models. Pasific-Basin Finance Journal, 27, 94-114.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v4i1.84
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Ekonomis: Journal of Economics and Business Published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat |
