Analisis Reformasi Tata Kelola Administrasi Pemerintahan (Studi Kasus Provinsi Jawa Barat)
Abstract
The challenges of governance in the era of globalization are becoming increasingly complex, particularly in West Java Province, which faces public demands for efficiency, transparency, and accountability in public services. Although governance reforms have been implemented, obstacles such as complex bureaucracy, a lack of accountability, and rapid socio-economic changes continue to impact service quality. This study aims to analyze the impact of administrative governance reforms on the efficiency of public services. The main focus of this research is on the changes in transparency and public participation resulting from the implemented reforms, as well as the primary challenges faced in their implementation, including bureaucratic obstacles and technology adoption. The research employs a qualitative approach. Data were collected through 30 in-depth interviews with 10 government officials, 10 business actors, and 10 members of the general public. Additionally, focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted involving 8-12 participants to gain deeper insights into their experiences related to governance reforms. Data analysis was performed using a thematic approach. The findings indicate that governance reforms in West Java Province have accelerated public administrative services, particularly through digitalization, which has reduced processing times for permits. However, challenges remain, such as limitations in human resources and technology, resistance to change among civil servants, and discrepancies in policy implementation across regions. Therefore, enhancing employee training and simplifying bureaucratic procedures are essential to ensure the sustainability of these reforms.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amiruddin, R., & Firmansyah, A. (2021). Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Harapan. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik Indonesia, 12(2), 145-159.
Antara News. (2024). KPK-Pemprov Jabar rapat koordinasi cegah korupsi pemerintah daerah - ANTARA News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4031421/kpk-pemprov-jabar-rapat-koordinasi-cegah-korupsi-pemerintah-daerah
Asosiasi Pengusaha Indonesia (APINDO). (2023). Laporan Survei Kepuasan Pelaku Usaha terhadap Reformasi Administrasi Publik di Indonesia. Jakarta: APINDO.
Arnstein, S. R. (2019). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(1), 24–34.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
BPS Jawa Barat. (2023). Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Provinsi Jawa Barat 2023.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Chih-Pei, H. U., & Chang, Y.-Y. (2017). John W. Creswell, research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 4(2), 205–207.
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Rovik, K. A. (2020). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth. Routledge.
Denzin, N. K. (2018). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Routledge.
Dye, T. R. (1992). Understanding Public Policy (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Dye, T. R. (1992). Understanding public policy. (No Title).
Grindle, M. (2012). Good Governance: The Inflation of an Idea. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series.
Grindle, M. (2012). Good governance: The inflation of an idea. Planning Ideas That Matter, 259–282.
Hanafi, M., Wibisono, D., Mangkusubroto, K., Siallagan, M., & Badriyah, M. J. K. (2017). Modelling competitive advantage of nation: a literature review. In Competitiveness Review (Vol. 27, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-06-2016-0031
Handayani, N., Izzatusholekha, I., & Kuncoro, H. F. (2023). Inovasi Aplikasi Samsat Mobile Jawa Barat (Sambara) Dalam Pelaksanaan Smart Governance. KAIS Kajian Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 49–57.
Handoko, W. (2020). Infrastruktur Teknologi dalam Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Pemerintahan, 8(1), 55-68.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less?: Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central Government. OUP Oxford.
Hood, C., & Heald, D. (2006). Transparency: The key to better governance? (Vol. 135). Oxford University Press for The British Academy.
Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (2018). Policy Design and Non-Design: Towards a Spectrum of Policy Formulation Types. Policy and Politics, 46(4), 519-536.
Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (2018). Routledge handbook of policy design. In Routledge Handbook of Policy Design. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351252928
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.
Kementerian Keuangan. (2021). Kajian Fiskal Regional.
Kerry Brown, & Osborne, S. P. (2012). Managing Change and Innovation in Public Service Organizations - Kerry Brown, Stephen P. Osborne - Google Buku. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=GloRgOwZrEwC&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=public+service+monitoring+cycle&ots=jSG7TLdPB5&sig=cWpdLvQ5T0ANytsy3lECRU4oalI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Kingdon, J. W. (1985). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
Klijn, E. H. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe. Public Management Review, 10(4), 505–525.
KPK. (2024). KPK: Cegah Korupsi pada Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa, E-Katalog Harus Diawasi Bersama. KPK. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/berita/berita-kpk/3451-kpk-cegah-korupsi-pada-pengadaan-barang-dan-jasa-e-katalog-harus-diawasi-bersama
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research 5th Edition. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research.
LAN-RI. (2023). Reformasi Birokrasi Harus Berdampak pada Peningkatan Investasi, LAN Gandeng Kementerian Investasi/BKPM Selenggarakan PKN Tingkat II Pola Khusus – LAN RI. https://lan.go.id/?p=15116
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. san francisco, ca: Lohn wiley & sons. Inc.
Milakovich, M. E. (2021). Digital governance: Applying advanced technologies to improve public service. Routledge.
Milakovich, M. E. (2021). Digital Governance: New Technologies for Improving Public Service and Participation. New York: Routledge.
O’Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353–366.
OECD. (2024). Development Co-operation Report 2024. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/357b63f7-en
Osborne, S. (2020). Public service logic: Creating value for public service users, citizens, and society through public service delivery. Routledge.
Osborne, S. P. (2020). Public Service Innovation and the Democratic State: Mapping the Future of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 595-605.
Papaconstantinou, G. (2023). Good governance. In The Elgar Companion to the OECD. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020269x00006289
Papaconstantinou, P. (2023). Governance in the Age of Complexity: Challenges for Local and Global Governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Barat. (2023). SKM JABAR. Pemda Jabar. https://skm.jabarprov.go.id/hasilskm
Perry, J. L., & Kingdon, J. W. (1985). Multiple Streams Framework in Public Policy Process. Boston: Little, Brown.
Perry, J., & Kingdon, J. W. (1985). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/3323801
Peters, B. G. (2018). The Politics of Bureaucracy : An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. The Politics of Bureaucracy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813653
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford university press.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Porter, M. (1990). Competitive Advantage of Nations. Competitive Intelligence Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/cir.3880010112
Quick, K. S., & Feldman, M. S. (2011). Distinguishing participation and inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11410979
Quick, K. S., & Feldman, M. S. (2011). Distinguishing Participation and Inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(3), 272-290.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. In Science Technology and Human Values (Vol. 25, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1), 3-29.
Sabatier, P. A. (2019). Theories of the Policy Process. In Theories of the Policy Process. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274689
Santosa, I., & Putri, A. (2018). Reformasi Birokrasi dan Tantangan ASN di Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 10(3), 189-205.
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. In Teachers College Press (Vol. 58, Issue 12).
Setiawan, A. (2017). Teknologi dan Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia: Studi Kasus di Daerah Terpencil. Jurnal Pemerintahan Indonesia, 5(2), 123-135.
Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. W. (2018). The public policy theory primer, Third edition. In The Public Policy Theory Primer, Third Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494352
Suharto, R. (2019). Dinamika Komitmen Politik dalam Reformasi Administrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kebijakan Publik, 12(4), 345-357.
Sutopo, Y., & Wijaya, I. (2019). Pengaruh Digitalisasi Layanan Publik terhadap Efisiensi Administrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Inovasi Administrasi Publik, 7(2), 101-115APINDO. (2023). Laporan Tahunan APINDO.
UNDP. (2009). Governance Indicators: A Users’ Guide.
United Nations. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2019a). Asia and the Pacific SDG progress report 2019.
United Nations. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2019b). The Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the.
Wahyudi, B. (2020). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengambilan Keputusan di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Kritis. Jurnal Partisipasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 11(1), 29-45.
Weber, M. (2009). The theory of social and economic organization. Simon and Schuster.
World Bank. (2024). World Bank Governance Global Practice Global Governance Program Executive Summary Governance & Institutions Umbrella TF.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v8i2.2169
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ekonomis: Journal of Economics and Business Published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat |
