Peran Sistem Informasi dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Audit Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah
Abstract
This study aims to examine the role of Information Systems (SI) in improving the quality of audits of local government financial statements. Audit of local government financial statements is a critical process in evaluating public finances and ensuring the reliability of financial information and compliance with applicable regulations. In recent years, the use of SI has become an important factor in improving audit quality by strengthening the efficiency, effectiveness, and accuracy of the audit process. A review of the literature reveals that the use of SI in auditing local government financial statements provides significant benefits. First, automation of the audit process using SI replaces error-prone manual tasks, thereby increasing audit efficiency. Second, SI facilitates efficient data collection and analysis, allowing auditors to access more accurate and comprehensive financial information. Third, SI strengthens internal supervision through real-time monitoring of financial activities and early detection of risks or policy violations. Finally, SI also provides protection against the security and integrity of sensitive data in auditing practices. However, the use of SI in auditing local government financial statements is also faced with challenges. These challenges include limited resources, complexity of system integration, security of sensitive data, and the need for increased auditor competence in understanding and using SI effectively. Through this research, it is hoped that a deeper understanding of the role of SI in improving the quality of audits of local government financial statements can be obtained. The results of this study can provide practical guidance and recommendations for auditors and local governments in making optimal use of SI, as well as overcoming challenges that may arise. Thus, it is expected that the practice of auditing local government financial statements can be more effective, accurate, and transparent, as well as provide significant benefits in public financial management.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, D. A. (1992). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance ofInformation Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.
Al-Hashimi, A. (2019). Transparency of government financial reporting: A case study of local government financial reporting in Iraq. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(6), 372–393.
Alam, N., Gupta, L., & Zameni, A. (2019). Fintech and Islamic finance. Springer.
Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. Springer.
Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Mayoral quality and local public finance. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 469–486.
Awrey, D., & Macey, J. (2022). The Promise and Perils of Open Finance. Available at SSRN 4045640.
Bailey, S. J. (1999). Local government economics: principles and practice. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Carnegie, G. D. (2005). Promoting accountability in municipalities. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64(3), 78–87.
Chesbrough, H., & Euchner, J. (2011). The evolution of open innovation: An interview with Henry Chesbrough. Research-Technology Management, 54(5), 13–18.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
Chorzempa, M., & Huang, Y. (2022). Chinese fintech innovation and regulation. Asian Economic Policy Review, 17(2), 274–292.
Collins, J. (2009). Good to Great-(Why some companies make the leap and others don’t). SAGE Publications Sage India: New Delhi, India.
Cresswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research Design: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif,dan Mixed. In Pustaka Pelajar (3rd ed.).
Cunha, F. A. F. de S., Meira, E., & Orsato, R. J. (2021). Sustainable finance and investment: Review and research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3821–3838.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford University Press.
English, L., Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (2005). Recent public sector financial management change in Australia. International Public Financial Management Reform, 23–54.
Feroz, A. K., Zo, H., & Chiravuri, A. (2021). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: A review and research agenda. Sustainability, 13(3), 1530.
Fisher, R. C. (2018). State and local public finance. Routledge.
Fountain, J. E. (2004). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings institution press.
Freeman, R. J., Shoulders, C. D., Allison, G. S., Patton, T. K., & Smith, G. R. (1999). Governmental and nonprofit accounting: Theory and practice. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&d Management, 40(3), 213–221.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research.
Goldsmith, L. J. (2021). Using Framework Analysis in Applied Qualitative Research. Qualitative Report, 26(6).
Goldstein, I., Jiang, W., & Karolyi, G. A. (2019). To FinTech and beyond. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1647–1661.
İpek, E. A. S. (2018). New approaches in public budgeting. In Public Economics and Finance. IntechOpen.
Iphofen, R., & Tolich, M. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research ethics. Sage.
Kitchen, H., McMillan, M., & Shah, A. (2019). Local public finance and economics. Springer Books.
Kotter, J. P. (1999). John P. Kotter on what leaders really do. Harvard Business Press.
Lapsley, I., & Pallot, J. (2000). Accounting, management and organizational change: A comparative study of local government. Management Accounting Research, 11(2), 213–229.
Li, L. (2010). A critical review of technology acceptance literature. Referred Research Paper, 4, 2010.
Lin, L., & Chen, C. (2020). The promise and perils of InsurTech. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, Mar 2020, 115–142.
Manoharan, A. P., & Ingrams, A. (2018). Conceptualizing e-government from local government perspectives. State and Local Government Review, 50(1), 56–66.
Mention, A.-L. (2019). The future of fintech. In Research-Technology Management (Vol. 62, Issue 4, pp. 59–63). Taylor & Francis.
Mikesell, J. L. (1991). Fiscal Administration: Analysis and Applications for the Public Sector. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks. Cole publishing company.
Milian, E. Z., Spinola, M. de M., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2019). Fintechs: A literature review and research agenda. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 34, 100833.
Miller, G. J. (1994). Local Government Finance: Concepts and Practices. Public Administration Review, 54(2), 209–213.
Molas-Gallart, J., Boni, A., Giachi, S., & Schot, J. (2021). A formative approach to the evaluation of Transformative Innovation Policies. Research Evaluation, 30(4), 431–442.
Money, W., & Turner, A. (2004). Application of the technology acceptance model to a knowledge management system. 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of The, 9-pp.
Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2022). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal.
Rafuse, R. W. (1991). Financing local government. Local Government Finance: Concepts and Practices. Chicago, Ill: Government Finance Officers Association, 9–27.
Reed, B. J., & Swain, J. W. (1996). Public finance administration. Sage Publications.
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
Rubin, I. (1996). Budgeting for Accountability: Municipal Budgeting for the 1990s. Public Budgeting Finance, 16(2), 112–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.01071
Ruggiero, P., Mazzillo, A., & Monfardini, P. (2022). Local government auditing in Italy. In Auditing practices in local governments: an international comparison (pp. 83–92). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Sanderson, I. (2001). Performance management, evaluation and learning in ‘modern’local government. Public Administration, 79(2), 297–313.
Schaeffer, M., & Yilmaz, S. (2008). Strengthening local government budgeting and accountability. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 4767.
Shah, A. (2007). Local Public Financial Management. In Local Public Financial Management. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6937-1
Silva, P. (2015). Davis’ technology acceptance model (TAM)(1989). Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption: Theories and Trends, 205–219.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. sage.
Stojakovic-Celustka, S. (2023). FinTech and its implementation. Measuring Ontologies for Value Enhancement: Aligning Computing Productivity with Human Creativity for Societal Adaptation: First International Workshop, MOVE 2020, Virtual Event, October 17–18, 2020, Revised Selected Papers, 256–277.
Susanto, Y., & Rambano, D. (2022). The Role of HRM Factors in Improving Performance Analysis of Local Government Financial Reports. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 2(2), 98–107.
Tsai, C.-L., & Ahn, J. M. (2023). How do institutional effects shape open innovation adoption? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1–13.
Utami, A. F., Ekaputra, I. A., & Japutra, A. (2021). Adoption of FinTech products: a systematic literature review. Journal of Creative Communications, 16(3), 233–248.
Van Horne, J. C., & Wachowicz Jr, J. M. (2008). Fundamentals of Finance Management. YD Williams", Moscow, Russia, 1232.
Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal Für Betriebswirtschaft, 55, 63–78.
Williams, C. (2007). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 5(3).
Yusran, I. N. (2023). Determinants of the quality of financial reports. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 8(3), 11.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v8i1.1822
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ekonomis: Journal of Economics and Business Published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat |
